<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WHAT&#8217;S NOT TO BELIEVE?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://andrewroman.net/2009/08/15/whats-not-to-believe/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://andrewroman.net/2009/08/15/whats-not-to-believe/</link>
	<description>combating liberalism and other childish notions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 14:03:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve</title>
		<link>http://andrewroman.net/2009/08/15/whats-not-to-believe/#comment-649</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[steve]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 23:56:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewromanblog.wordpress.com/?p=8530#comment-649</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Points very well made and well received here. I watched Obama&#039;s campaign closely, and while much of what you mentioned was made public, none of the main stream media made a big deal about any of it. Of course the liberalism of Obama was mentioned. But that was it. Simply mentioned, then moved on to something else. Any research had to be done basically by the individual, and everyone knew most people were going to be too lazy to do the kind of research needed to find out about him. A good point you made was America needed saving after the 8 years of George W. Bush. Bush was relentlessly demonized for his entire presidency. So, &#039;change&#039; is what we got...the old saying &quot;be careful what you wish for&quot; comes to mind. Oh, I didn&#039;t vote for him.
Anyway, great post; thanks]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Points very well made and well received here. I watched Obama&#8217;s campaign closely, and while much of what you mentioned was made public, none of the main stream media made a big deal about any of it. Of course the liberalism of Obama was mentioned. But that was it. Simply mentioned, then moved on to something else. Any research had to be done basically by the individual, and everyone knew most people were going to be too lazy to do the kind of research needed to find out about him. A good point you made was America needed saving after the 8 years of George W. Bush. Bush was relentlessly demonized for his entire presidency. So, &#8216;change&#8217; is what we got&#8230;the old saying &#8220;be careful what you wish for&#8221; comes to mind. Oh, I didn&#8217;t vote for him.<br />
Anyway, great post; thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

